When LinkedIn Career Network were 6.5 million passwords stolen. Whether you're at it? Do you find here and here out. Use at your own risk, of course, there!
What are the tools? You hash the passwords and these same hash (of course not the password in plain text) with the database of 6.5 million stolen passwords from. Whether you trust the whole thing of course is your thing. I would just fix change my password and then try with the old password these tools in order to know if my account has been hacked.
The guys from BestBoyZ have a new set, again very very good, Nokia's new flagship N8 to review online. Whopping 56 minutes long, the smartphone is illuminated and presents all the features. So who is interested in the N8, should look at the video times.
Otherwise, Nokia has quite a lot to catch up. Google and Apple have long dominated the mobile phone market (yes, Symbian is the most used OS, blah. Compared to Android or iOS Symbian is pretty yuck.). Whether Nokia with the N8 manages to turn, you can see in the video.
PS: BestBoyZ should keep her in the eyes. The guys some great reviews!
Yes, there was much talk about the iPhone 4 in the last days. I must confess frankly that I now can not find the new iPhone outstanding. It just blows me not from the stool. Solely the very high-resolution display makes me happy. Such resolution has so far had never been installed in a display. 960 × 640 pixels summarizes the display to be exact. Multiplying these figures, one comes to a total of 614,400 pixels on 3.5 inches! Since one or the other naturally asks how that goes. The principle is quite easy: you make the pixels smaller, and gets more so on a surface. So summarizes an inch on the iPhone 326 pixels. The eye can perceive (on a "normal" range) 300 pixels per inch. Applying this idea to the new iPhone, it becomes evident that the human eye may not perceive the gaps between the many pixels.
I have at PCWorld found 2 pictures that show and compare the display of the old and the display of the new iPhone.
The avid stalker Scatterd it might be read along: I have at Bjorn's Windows Blog a single license of Kaspersky PURE won, the latest version of security suite of the Russian IT security company Kaspersky. Thanks again to this point for the win! I can use him well, but I had not really an adequate security solution for my system since switching from XP to Windows 7 I had actually previously already installed a Kaspersky Security Suite. These were the Kaspersky suite, which is included on the computer screen. However, it was at this software so that it was not really suitable for Windows 7. The software has been adapted well manually for the new system and was released after a while. The whole was called then Kaspersky Security Suite CBE Win7 and I was somehow suspect. I'm still a while then drove with the software. Problems I had not eventually. However, I noticed that the PC was somewhat slower, which probably lay at Kaspersky. Fortunately, I have won but now Kaspersky PURE, so I could sweep this "half-half" solution from the computer.
A few days ago the latest product from Apple named iPad is now on the market. Since I have about as good as never reported, and otherwise also little time currently have (High School), I thought to myself, I imagine even a few videos of tests of the iPad online.
(I know that is not really to create the fine art content. However, I am currently almost forced to. I do not want the blog so let them die.)
Just yesterday, is only a new build of Digsby been released. And I was amazed how great the thing but now looks like and what it can do. ICQ, MSN, Jabber, Facebook, Twitter. Just about everything! And all for free. Niente you have to pay. Does not sound bad until I went to my first (few months ago) trying to install the thing at first glance. The latter was actually pretty straightforward, except the advertising that is "offered" to the user during installation, disturbed. But that also did not matter, tick away and you're done. So, why not Digbsy? Or Miranda? QIP? Which one now? 5 Messenger in all-round shock.
The first time makes Digsby . Digsby provides everything the user needs: The most commonly used protocols and connectivity to the most popular social networking services such as Facebook or Twitter. Yes, even the GMail account you can with this query in-literally-Multi-Messenger. Only the program is well reputed in English, but actually the young PC users should not slow down. For all friends of visual entertainment here's a video of all that Digsby can.
Trillian is likely some of you be familiar. There also is a multi-messenger. Since the relaunch of Trillian, which now adorns itself with the increases Astra, Trillian Astra also supports a seemingly plethora of protocols. MSN, ICQ, YAHOO, AIM, as well as IRC or even social networking sites like Twitter, Myspace and Facebook are one of the party. Actually, again, no wishes remain open. The thing even there in German. But unfortunately there is one thing that annoy me at Trillian Astra and Digsby neat.
IM passwords in the cloud server
Actually, Trillian and Digsby so make something right. After my little anecdote in the previous part of this article, the resourceful and zealous followers asks (and thinkers) dogs: Yes, why did not because the Moppet on your PC when it is so awesome, the answer is actually answered quickly: Both Messenger store all IM data, so your passwords to your account, the deposited her in the program on our own server. When you first start the program you created an account with the manufacturer of the Multi-Messenger and then linked all IM accounts, such as ICQ, AIM and Twitter, with this one account. The data is not stored on your computer, but centrally in the network. The course also has its advantages: you can only log in with a user name and a password to all associated accounts. For me, my passwords are still on my PC. Also, if the producers promise to transfer everything encrypted, I am not quite comfortable with the idea, my history or account information somewhere, on any server around. I do not want easy. My details are on my PC. But, what to do?
So one goes on the further search for messengers. Over time you will be at Miranda can not ignore. This is an open-source multi-messenger. Again, there are no limits. To enumerate all the protocols would be a bit misplaced. I'm sure Miranda has what you want. Miranda has it all. But there lies the problem: Miranda has so much that it is to look for a layman hardly. The installation of plugins even difficult for an experienced user. I have certainly not want me only for hours zuquälen with the installation of plugins around before so I have the messenger, as I would like it to be. So Miranda falls for me off too. But unfortunately there is not much left to messengers.
QIP I used very long time. I was very happy with it. QIP is simple. QIP works. Just chat. More I will not. I do not want any stupid games. No stupid ICQ 6 Fairground GUI. There is now also a new version of QIP, QIP Infium scolds himself. She has never liked me. I always have the old, QIP 2005 used. The stupid thing was just only that it only supports the ICQ protocol and file transfers almost never worked.
Funny name, great Messenger. If I did not know better, I'd say qutIM is a clone of QIP. It has almost the same features, the same appearance. Only supports more protocols that matters. Well, so many are not now. ICQ, Jabber, IRC and a few other Russian service (the programmer comes from Russia). In the network, the data is not stored. qutIM is ideal for me. Unfortunately, social networks are not supported. A few can be supplemented with plug-ins in my opinion. But because I always do not use such services in a messenger to me the stuff does not matter.
I have qutIM only a short time in use, but I'm relatively sure I will go and stay with it. Yes, even the chat histories can be imported from a number of IM's via the built-History Manager. With me and QIP but that did not work so well. Such a pity.
But I still think qutIM will be my new permanent candidate. Ultimately, everyone has to know himself, what he wants to use Messenger, yes. However, I am very satisfied with qutIM.
Golem was at the Mobile World Congress 2010 and has now visited times the level of ELSE to try out their future flagship model, the First ELSE and time to lend a hand. It came out is the following video:
Here is a small, five-minute presentation of the First Else by the Israeli mobile developers Else. Good to see the fully animated interface in Minority Report style. Everything looks very futuristic but elegant:
Actually, you need not even talk about what the iPad is. In the Zwitscherszene can anyway any deal with the hashtag. The articles here will also not be a mere Factpushing. But still, come a bit: The iPad is basically a normal tablet PC (or slate, as Microsoft has but recently renamed these things). The iPad has a 1 GHz processor (Apple A4), a 9.7-inch capacitive touch screen, a wireless chip, optional 3G, 16-64 GB flash memory and speakers and a headphone jack. All this is basically nothing special, offered previous tablets really the same.
What do you do now but with so an iPad? As a TV magazine the thing but would make not bad. Or as a newspaper. Looks quite chic. But no, not yet. On such a display to read permanently is not as pleasing to the eye. Finally, there is not nothing eInk displays. At the site may also be a link to a mirror-satire given.
In addition, one should not be of the attractive design (which I actually do not like the so hot) blinded. The unit has still not multitasking. So it is not possible to have 2 or more open application simultaneously. That's a shame, especially since that's indispensable for a computer. Especially for a device on which men ought to work. Should I stop an application to open the next for about forever? Hello? WTH?
Let's get to the next story, Flash. So far, it has not got to the range Apple to supporten Flash. It looks at a keynote like that of yesterday not just beautiful when you go to the website of New York Times and the entire right Flashblock in the margin is missing . I think it's frankly embarrassing that the second largest IT companies still resists worldwide for a correct representation of websites. In this case, one wants to make cooperate on the part of Adobe .
A camera is incidentally also not available, so fleet video chat would probably also history. As yet ultimately remains the question: what does the iPad actually be? A kind of big iPod touch? Or a Maxi iPhone inelegant and whistles? Or is the iPhone a iPad nano ?
Mainly, I can imagine the device in the corporate sector. Flott times enter an appointment, manage addresses and create presentations in an elegant way. But for that it's really too expensive. $ 499 you have to shell out for the tablet.
I personally would rather wait as a Slate with Windows 7. The latter now has multi-touch (and multitasking). In addition, Flash support, and everything else. What more could you want? The HP Slate would be for example a nice candidate. Sorry if now is the Apple fans stand stupid. But where is the advantage of an iPad over a Slates? In my opinion it is so that the slates there really have the edge. If you do not think so, yes you can immortalize your opinion in the comments
Oh, and here is the promised test video to iPad from engadget: