When LinkedIn Career Network were 6.5 million passwords stolen. Whether you're at it? Do you find here and here out. Use at your own risk of course!
What are the tools? You hash the passwords and these same hash (of course not the password in plain text) with the database of 6.5 million passwords stolen from. Whether you trust the whole thing of course is your thing. I would just fix change my password and then try with the old password these tools to know if my account has been hacked also.
The guys from BestBoyZ have found a new, again very very good review of Nokia's new flagship N8 online. Whopping 56 minutes long, the smartphone is illuminated and presents all functions. Whoever is interested in the N8, should look at the video times.
Otherwise, Nokia has quite a lot to catch up. Have long since Google and Apple dominated the mobile phone market (yes, Symbian is the most used OS, blah. Compared to Android or iOS Symbian is pretty yuck.). Whether Nokia with the N8 manages to turn, you can see in the video.
PS: BestBoyZ should keep her in the eyes. The guys some great reviews!
Yes, it was a lot of talk about the iPhone 4 in the last days. I must confess frankly that I now can not find the new iPhone outstanding. It just blows me not from the stool. Solely the very high-resolution display makes me happy. Such resolution has so far had never been installed in a display. 960 × 640 pixels summarizes the display to be exact. Multiplying these figures, one arrives at a total of 614,400 pixels on 3.5 inches! Since one or the other course asks how that goes. The principle is quite easy: you make the pixels smaller, and gets more so on a surface. So sums up an inch on the iPhone 326 pixels. The eye can perceive (on a "normal" range) 300 pixels per inch. Applying this idea to the new iPhone, it becomes evident that our eye may not perceive the gaps between the many pixels.
I have at PCWorld found two shots that show and compare the display of the old and the display on the new iPhone.
The avid stalker Scatterd it might be read along: I chose Bjorn Windows Blog a single license of Kaspersky PURE won, the latest version of security suite of Russian IT-security company Kaspersky. Thanks again to this point for the win! I can use it well, but I had not really adequate security solution for my system since switching from XP to Windows 7, I had actually previously already installed a Kaspersky Security Suite. These were the Kaspersky suite is included on the computer screen. However, it was at this software so that it was not really suitable for Windows 7. The software has been adapted well manually for the new system and was also released after a while. The whole was called then Kaspersky Security Suite CBE Win7 and I was somehow suspect. I'm still a while then drove with the software. Problems I had not finally. However, I noticed that the PC was somewhat slower, which was probably at Kaspersky. Fortunately, I have now won Kaspersky PURE, so I could sweep this "half-half" solution from the computer.
A few days ago the latest product from Apple named iPad is now on the market. Since I have about as good as never reported, and otherwise also currently have little time (Abitur), I thought to myself, I imagine even a few videos of tests of the iPad online.
(I know that is really not to create the fine art content. However, I am currently almost forced to. I do not want the blog so let them die.)
Just yesterday, is only a new build of Digsby been released. And I was amazed how great the thing but now looks like and what it can do. ICQ, MSN, Jabber, Facebook, Twitter. Just about everything! And all for free. Niente you have to pay. Does not sound bad until I went to my first (few months ago) I try to install the thing at first glance. The latter was actually pretty straightforward, except the advertising that is "offered" to the user during installation, disturbed. But that also did not matter, tick away and ready. So, why not Digbsy? Or Miranda? QIP? Which one now? 5 Messenger in all-round shock.
The first time makes Digsby . Digsby provides everything a user needs: The most commonly used protocols and access to the famous social networking services such as Facebook or Twitter. Yes, even the GMail account can be queried with this -im truest sense of the Wortes- Multi-Messenger. Only the program is well reputed in English, but actually the young PC users should not slow down. For all friends of visual entertainment here's a video of all that Digsby can.
Trillian is likely some of you be familiar. It also is a Multi-Messenger. Since the relaunch of Trillian, which now adorns itself with increases Astra, Trillian Astra also supports a sheer plethora of protocols. MSN, ICQ, YAHOO, AIM, but also IRC or social networks like Twitter, Myspace and Facebook are one of the party. Actually, again, no wishes remain unfulfilled. The thing even there in German. But unfortunately there is one thing that annoy me at Trillian Astra and Digsby properly.
IM passwords in the cloud server
Actually, Trillian and Digsby do so much right. After my little anecdote in the previous part of this article, the resourceful and zealous followers asks (and thinkers) dogs: Yes, why did the Moppet because not on your PC, if it is so awesome The answer is actually answered quickly: Both Messenger Save all the IM data, so your passwords to your account, the deposited her in the program on our own server. When you first start the program you created an account with the manufacturer of the Multi-Messenger and then links all IM accounts, such as ICQ, AIM, or Twitter, with this one account. The data is not stored on your computer, but centrally in the network. The course also has its advantages: you can login with just a username and password on all linked accounts. For me, my passwords are still on my PC. Even if the producers promise to transfer everything encrypted, I am not entirely comfortable with the idea, my history or account information somewhere, on any server rum. I do not want easy. My details are on my PC. But, what to do?
So one goes on the further search for messengers. Over time you will be at Miranda not come. This is an Open-Source Multi-Messenger. Again, there are no limits. To enumerate all the protocols would be a bit out of place. I'm sure Miranda has what you want. Miranda has it all. But there lies the problem: Miranda has so much that it is to look for a layman hardly. The installation of plugins even difficult for an experienced user. I have certainly no desire me only hours zuquälen with the installation of plugins around, so before I got the messenger, I might have it. So Miranda falls for me away also. But unfortunately there is not much left to messengers.
QIP I took a very long time. I was very happy with it. QIP is simple. QIP works. Just chat. More I will not. I do not want any stupid games. No stupid ICQ 6 Fairground GUI. There is now also a new version of QIP, QIP Infium scolds himself. She has never liked me. I always have the old, QIP 2005 used. The stupid thing was just only that this only supports the ICQ protocol and file transfers almost never worked.
Funny name, great Messenger. If I did not know better, I'd say qutIM is a clone of QIP. It has almost the same features, the same appearance. Only supports more protocols that matters. Well, so many are not now. ICQ, Jabber, IRC and a few other Russian service (the programmer comes from Russia). In the network, the data is not stored. qutIM is ideal for me. Unfortunately, social networks are not supported. A few can be added by plugins in my opinion. But because I always do not use such services in a Messenger, the stuff does not matter to me.
I qutIM only a short time in use, but I'm relatively sure I will go and stay with it. Yes, even the chat histories can be imported from a number of IM's via the integrated history manager. With me and QIP but that did not work so well. What a pity.
But I still think qutIM will be my new permanent candidate. Ultimately, everyone has to know himself, what he wants to use Messenger yes. I am very satisfied with qutIM.
Golem was at the Mobile World Congress 2010 and immediately times visited the status of ELSE to try out their future flagship model, the First ELSE and time to lend a hand. It came out is the following video:
Here is a small, five-minute presentation of the First Else on Israeli mobile developers Else. Good to see the fully animated interface in Minority Report style. Everything looks very futuristic but elegant:
Actually you do not even talk about what the iPad is. In the Zwitscherszene can anyway any deal with the hashtag. The articles here will also not be a mere Factpushing. But come on, a bit: The iPad is basically a normal tablet (or slate, as Microsoft has but recently renamed these things). The iPad has a 1 GHz processor (Apple A4), a 9.7-inch capacitive touchscreen, a wireless chip, optional 3G, 16-64 GB flash memory and speakers and a headphone jack. All this is basically nothing special, offered to date Tablets really the same.
What makes you so but with an iPad? As a TV magazine, the thing would still make not bad. Or as a newspaper. Looks quite chic. But no, not yet. On such a display to read permanently is not as pleasing to the eye. Finally, there is good reason eInk displays. At the site may also be a link to a mirror-satire given.
Moreover, one should not be on the smart design (which I like it actually does not so hot) blinded. The unit has still not multitasking. So it is not possible to have 2 or more open application simultaneously. That's a shame, especially since that's essential for a computer. Especially for a device on which men ought to work. Should I stop an application to open the next for about forever? Hello there? WTH?
Let's get to the next story, Flash. So far, it has not got the number Apple To support Flash. It looks at a keynote like yesterday not just beautiful when you go to the website of New York Times and the entire right Flashblock in the margin is missing . I think it's frankly embarrassing that the second largest IT company still struggles worldwide against a correct representation of websites. Here you will but cooperate on the part of Adobe .
A camera is actually not available, so brisk Video Chats probably would also history. Since it is ultimately the question: What does the iPad actually be? A kind of big iPod touch? Or a Maxi iPhone without Schick-knacks? Or is the iPhone an iPad nano ?
Mainly, I can imagine the device in the business sector. Flott times enter an appointment, manage addresses and create presentations in an elegant way. But it's really too expensive. $ 499 you have to shell out for the tablet.
I personally would rather wait because on a Slate with Windows 7. The latter now also has multi-touch (and multitasking). In addition, Flash support, and everything else. What more could you want? The HP Slate would be for example a nice candidate. Sorry if now the Apple fans stand stupid. But where is the advantage of an iPad over a Slates? In my opinion it is so that the slates there really have the edge. If you do not think so, yes you can immortalize your thoughts in the Comments
Oh, and here is the promised test video to iPad from engadget: