-
- Image by cgre via Flickr
"Right next to the Stuttgart parliament they have set up a container. They collect killer games like "World of Warcraft", "Counter Strike", "Call of Duty". Games, where the sparks fly - people scraps, and more realistic in its presentation. They can deliver the Action Alliance, so they will be destroyed. "
This is the original sound of a documentary or a documentary about the horrific school shooting in Winnenden, which ran yesterday evening by 21 clock in the ARD. And it is again a good example of sloppy journalism and gamers rush. After all, would be the people of the ARD once properly informed, then they would know that in World of Warcraft is not the sparks fly. Even if one could infer from Mr. T's advertising on it. Which is not so. Dear ARD hacks: In WoW (the geeky gamer abbreviation have been World of Warcraft) is an online fantasy role-playing game in the comic book look. Fantasy comic! People there have very little search. And a comic realism is surely not really, right? Otherwise would have my favorites of the Warner Bros.-forged long ago to fall down the houses and the Meep, Meep-cattle should have been flashed already.
Aside from the fact there is not yet in Counter Strike Call of Duty tattered man. But the matter goes further.
It is claimed towards the end that the U.S. Army uses first-person shooter to lower the threshold of the soldiers. This was clearly demonstrated and therefore not at all to question. In addition, it is claimed that players who play a lot, play more aggressive games.
As you can imagine, this is utter nonsense both. Let's start with the last claim on. People who want to play a lot, mainly to play aggressive games. I can not imagine not. What about sports games, strategy or role playing? Let's take as an example Anno. In this game, a game is longer than for a first-person shooter that takes in the most laps only 5 minutes. Sure, there are also longer rounds. In general, this is not the case. In Anno, a building game, building a city can ever take several days.
Let's talk about the famous U.S. Army argument, which is taken always welcome. Supposedly the Army to use games to reduce inhibitions. This is simply utter nonsense. First time training the Army is still shooting at real shooting ranges, because they have found that it still makes a difference whether you shoot in real or virtual (yes, a normal person can distinguish between!). And secondly, there are no studies that suggest a reduction of the threshold, even some who argue against it. A statement on game studies :
Summarized here is found that the currently circulating statements on the reduction of the work is based on inhibition of killing, can withstand normal scientific criticism in any way. Here, military simulations with computer games thrown into a pot and correlations allowed causal relationships, some of which are dragged in the hair. It is quite clear this is a myth based on the Medieninkompetenz its propagators.
So you see: The ARD report, it was usual baiting of computer games. Those that we hear for months. Who wants to look at the report itself, which can here do (from minute 35 starts the horror).
[Via stigma video games ]