Among the young people among you (and probably most of his) is the thing long ago talking point number one: The Internet censorship and the discussions around the topic. For the older ones among you who noticed there was not, I put together again briefly what is understood under the policy of Internet censorship.

Establish the Government presented a bill providing for so-called DNS blocking for websites with child pornography content. Grob said would be placed before each "Kipo" page a virtual stop sign. Such was the actual plan. Over time the law was expanded to include a significant change: Every access to a child porn site will be logged and sent to the IP to the BKA. That means: If you would like someone playing a prank, so you have a search warrant may, it is only necessary to integrate a graph of the restricted side somewhere else. If you land it on the page with the linked site, is also the image of the locked page is loaded and your IP logged. In this case the police should investigate you, though you have done absolutely nothing criminal. Even if you are supposedly going to a blocked page and then quickly leaves again, this can have a tracking result. Or frightening story? But either way about it could look at small Meier.

The very bright-eyed among you may also have the online petition to get wind, which was opened only a few days ago and has already achieved a minimum of 50,000 Mitzeichnern. Blatant thing. At the moment in which I write this, the number stands at 64 427 signatories to. That's a lot! The online petition is the way, why not set up STOP signs on the net. Like what? About 50,000 people on the Internet to keep Kipo sites on the net? Sick people these Internet geeks. But wait! There was probably some misunderstanding, first of all, if you have not read the description of the petition properly, such as the good Mr. von und zu Guttenberg. He did an interview with the daily issues the following statement:

It makes me very concerned if a flat rate should give the impression that there are people who are resisting the blocking of child pornography. This is really one of the most important projects in many ways.

As has probably not read a really, if he has looked at all once the ePetition. The petition against the installation of stop signs on the Internet, yes. But not against the blocking of child pornography websites. The petition criticizes only the implementation of the locks. DNS blocks are virtually ineffective. One ends up with a stop sign 2 pages will continue but explains how to handle this. It does not take long, and even a layman. How about if the BKA to confiscate all the energy that would put into the investigation of accident at STOP sign gelangene sites users into it, the server to lock the pages and take from the net? Would not that be more effective? In my opinion, yes. What's gone is gone.

Thank you for your attention.

PS: Here you will find all the videos the way to parliamentary debate of Internet censorship. Oh yes: The Zensursula, Ursula von der Leyen was, incidentally, not at the debate and has cleared.

PPS: And here you will find an interview of a victim of abuse, which this debate is not doing well. Another proof of how ignorant the current government is yet.

No related articles.